REDUCING METHANE EMISSIONS
yes

Benvenuti in Selko®. Questo sito è disponibile anche in italiano.

Benvenuti in Selko®. Questa pagina è disponibile anche in italiano.

Visita il sito Rifiuta

Bienvenido a Selko®. Este sitio también está disponible en español

Bienvenido a Selko®. Esta página también está disponible en inglés

Visitar la web Cancelar

Vítejte ve společnosti Selko®. Tyto stránky jsou k dispozici také v češtině

Vítejte ve společnosti Selko®. Tato stránka je k dispozici také v angličtině

Navštivte stránky Zrušit

Vítame Vás na Selko®. Táto stránka je k dispozícii aj v slovenskom jazyk.

Vitajte v spoločnosti Selko®. Táto stránka je k dispozícii aj v slovenskom jazyku.

Prejdite na webovú lokalitu Zrušit

Bem-vindo à Selko®. Este site também está disponível em língua portuguesa.

Bem-vindo à Selko®. Esta página também está disponível em português.

Visite o site Cancelar

Select your sector:

The trace mineral source used for feed production has an impact on the carbon footprint of a beef cattle operation

Important to know...

Figure 1: greenhouse gas emissions per kg of meat produced for a beef operation, expressed as percentage of the total GHG emission of a farm. 10% of the GHG production, equivalent to about 25% of the carbon footprint, is related to farm supply sources, including te feed for beef cattle.

Manufacturers of feed for beef cattle are trying to reduce the carbon footprint of feed production

The animal nutrition industry is developping new products, programs and practices to significantly reduce the CO2eq emissions of beef cattle. Significant progress has been made, but additonal efforts will be required to reach the goals that consumers and governments are proposing. It will not be possible for the beef industry to reach the CO2eq reduction targets with one single product or program. A group effort, with several products, programs and practices, contributing to a successful outcome, will be required to achieve a significant reduction of CO2eq emissions from beef cattle operations. Reports indicate that about 10% of the total greenhouse gass emmissions of a beef farm are related to on-farm supply sources, including emissions from the production of feed supplied to the farm (see Figure 1). GHG emmissions included in te total are CO2, N2O, and CH4. This means that about 25% of the carbonfootprint of a beef operation comes from farm supplies, with a huge contribution from feed. Therefore, premixers and feed compounders will be facing a growing demand from beef farmers to provide them with a total CO2eq number for the feed they are supplying to their beef operations.

How can the carbon footprint of an ingredient for beef cattle feed be calculated?

To assist producers of feed for beef cattle operations with calculating the CO2eq emissions resulting from producing the ingredients they use within their feed, NGO and industry groups have agreed on a set of mandatory guidelines to be used for the calculation of the CO2eq number of an ingredient used to produce feed for beef cattle. Within this evaluation, a tool referred to as a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is crucial. The LCA template must be completed for each ingredient. Once the LCA has been completed, it should be reviewed by an independant party, to ensure that all approved guidelines (ISO 14040 and 14044 statues) were followed when the Life Cycle Assesment was executed. If the information is assessed to be correct, the LCA’s outcome will be verified, providing manufacturers of feed for beef cattle with an independent verification on the CO2eq number of the particular ingredient.

The LCA for the production of Selko IntelliBond

Having this number available allows nutritionists and manufacturers of compound feed and farm minerals for beef cattle to effectively evaluate the individual CO2eq impact of various ingredients being added to their products, with the objective of lower the total impact of the product. To assist with this growing need from feed manufacturers for validated information, an LCA which identifies the carbon footprint for each of Selko IntelliBond’s individual product was completed recently (See Figure 2). These values are specific to the Selko IntelliBond manufacturing process and will be of value to feed compounders and premixer that are working to reduce the carbon footprint of their products.


Selko product CO2eq / Mt Product CO2eq / Kg Metal % Metal
Selko IntelliBond C 2.37 Mt 4.39 Kg 54%
Selko IntelliBond Z 1.94 Mt 3.46 Kg 56%
Selko IntelliBond M 2.53 Mt 5.75 Kg 44%

Figure 2, CO2 equivalents per metric ton of Selko IntelliBond produced and per kg of metal for Selko IntelliBond C, Selko IntelliBond Z and Selko IntelliBond M.

Selko IntelliBond is the first feed additive for animals that has been included in the GFLI database

The Global Feed LCA Institute (GFLI) has a database that holds a comprehensive collection of all animal feed ingredients for which the carbon footprint of producing the particular animal feed ingredient was calculated. It only contains datasets for animal feed ingredients that were created using LCA methodology. Its primary purpose is to provide manufacturers of animal feed a credible and transparent environmental assessment of the animal feed ingredients they use in their feeds.

All the information about the carbon footprint of animal feed ingredients that is included in the GFLI database has been validated by a team of independent experts by using a FAO-LEAP and EU-PEF compliant methodology. This methodology is built on 4 reference documents to adhere to globally standardized guidelines of the FAO and the EU. These 4 guidelines are the FAO LEAP feed guidelines (2016), the FAO LEAP feed additives guidelines (2020), the EU Feed PEF database methodology (2017), and the Feed PEFCR (2018).

The detailed information in the database can assist the industry in improving their environmental footprint. Selko IntelliBond is the first feed additive for animals that was incorporated into this database, which is a significant achievement. GFLI certification of an animal feed additive provides recognition and validation from an independent, prestigious institute. Furthermore, inclusion in the GFLI database allows the data to be accessible to a global audience that is working hard to make dairy and beef farming more sustainable.

Conclusion

Reaching the targets for beef producers, set by governmental and consumer groups will not be easy. A holistic approach will be required. Beef producers should use feed that has been produced with a minimal carbon footprint. The LCA for the 3 Selko IntelliBond products will provide manufacturers of feed for beef cattle operations with an independent verification on the CO2eq number of their trace mineral source.

Download more research and documentation

You can access all of our documentation about the science behind Selko products and services as well as Selko technical bulletins about ruminant challenges and technical product data sheets.

Feed compounders and premixers are being asked by their customers to provide the total carbon footprint of the feeds and premixes they are manufacturing. When formulators are aware of the individual carbon footprints of the ingredients being selected for inclusion within their customers’ blends, they can knowledgably select those ingredients that offer the lowest total carbon footprint. To assist with this need Selko completed a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to verify the total carbon footprint of its Selko IntelliBond Copper, Zinc and Manganese trace mineral products. Selko IntelliBond trace minerals are the first sources of trace mineral nutrition with an independent verification for their total CO2eq values. The availability of these values will allow feed compounders, premixers and nutritionists to better formulate their blends to comply with their customers’ need to reduce CO2eq emissions associated with livestock production.

Or visit our download center for more information:

Go to download center

Register once and download all you need

This is not correct
This field is required
This is not correct
This is not correct.
This is not correct

Thank you for your interest in Selko

We have just sent you an email. Follow the instructions in this email to complete your download. Notice that In some cases, spam filters can block automated emails. If you do not find the email in your inbox, please check your junk email folder.

Have a nice day!

Connect with our experts

Navigating the daily operations of dairy and beef farming is challenging, and the transition towards sustainable practices raises numerous questions.

Selko ruminant specialists are dedicated to help you assess and address these challenges effectively. For personalized support and expert advice on achieving sustainable and profitable farming, get in touch with our team today.

This information is required
This information is required
This is not correct
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Afghanistan
  • Albania
  • Algeria
  • American Samoa
  • Andorra
  • Angola
  • Anguilla
  • Antarctica
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Aruba
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Belgium
  • Belize
  • Benin
  • Bermuda
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • British Indian Ocean Territory
  • British Virgin Islands
  • Brunei
  • Bulgaria
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
  • Cape Verde
  • Cayman Islands
  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
  • Chile
  • China
  • Christmas Island
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands
  • Colombia
  • Comoros
  • Congo
  • Cook Islands
  • Costa Rica
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Curaçao
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Estonia
  • Ethiopia
  • Falkland Islands
  • Faroe Islands
  • Fiji
  • Finland
  • France
  • French Guiana
  • French Polynesia
  • French Southern Territories
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Gibraltar
  • Greece
  • Greenland
  • Grenada
  • Guadeloupe
  • Guam
  • Guatemala
  • Guernsey
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Hong Kong S.A.R., China
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • Ireland
  • Isle of Man
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Jersey
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kiribati
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Laos
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Libya
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Macao S.A.R., China
  • Macedonia
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Malta
  • Marshall Islands
  • Martinique
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mayotte
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Mongolia
  • Montenegro
  • Montserrat
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Netherlands
  • New Caledonia
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Niue
  • Norfolk Island
  • North Korea
  • Northern Mariana Islands
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Palau
  • Palestinian Territory
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Pitcairn
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Qatar
  • Romania
  • Russia
  • Rwanda
  • Réunion
  • Saint Barthélemy
  • Saint Helena
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Samoa
  • San Marino
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Serbia
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
  • Solomon Islands
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • South Korea
  • South Sudan
  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen
  • Swaziland
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Syria
  • Taiwan
  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania
  • Thailand
  • Timor-Leste
  • Togo
  • Tokelau
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Tuvalu
  • U.S. Virgin Islands
  • Uganda
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States Minor Outlying Islands
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
  • Vatican
  • Venezuela
  • Viet Nam
  • Wallis and Futuna
  • Western Sahara
  • Yemen
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
This is not correct.
This information is required
This is not correct

Thank you reaching out!

Thank you for contacting us. Your form has been successfully submitted, and a confirmation email with further details is on its way to you. In the meantime, we invite you to explore more about our innovative solutions and best practices for sustainable dairy and beef farming on our website.

Figure 1: greenhouse gas emissions per kg of meat produced for a beef operation, expressed as percentage of the total GHG emission of a farm. 10% of the GHG production, equivalent to about 25% of the carbon footprint, is related to farm supply sources, including te feed for beef cattle.

References about reducing the carbon footprint of beef farming

Gerber, P.; Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. EISBN 978-92-5-107921-8.

Find out more about sustainable beef farming...