Three treatments were compared. Copper, zinc and manganese NASEM requirements for beef were targeted either with sulphates or with Selko IntelliBond hydroxychloride trace minerals. The third group was fed half the amount of Selko IntelliBond hydroxychloride trace minerals advised by NASEM. All 3 mineral treatments for beef cattle were offered to the cows via a free choice mineral supplement. To increase the risk of antagonism, sulphur was included in each of the 3 supplements at a level of 12%.
Cows were blocked by weight, body condition, age, gestation and liver trace mineral status before they were randomly assigned to a treatment. Cows were synchronized and timed AI was used. Two AI technicians randomly bred half of the cows across the treatments to try to make sure the number of cows bred with AI was even between the 3 groups. After the timed AI, all cows were exposed to cleanup bulls for 46 days.
Mineral intake was recorded monthly, body weight, condition score, and pregnancy rates were scored annually. Liver samples were collected and analysed and weaning weight of the calves was recorded.
Results, mineral intake off the beef cattle included in the trial
The trial aimed at an intake of 114 grams of supplement per head per day, to target the 1 times NASEM sulphate treatment, the 1 times NASEM hydroxy treatment and 50% of the NASEM requirements for the second hydroxy trace mineral group. Assumptions about trace mineral levels in the graze forage were taken into account and the aim was to feed 1000 ppm copper, 3000 ppm zinc, and 2000 ppm manganese for the 2 groups at 100% of the NASEM requirements for beef cattle and 500 ppm copper, ppm 1500 zinc, and a 1000 ppm manganese for the third group.
In year 1, it turned out that almost double of the amount intended was fed, this was adjusted for years 2 and 3. Over the full 3-year timeframe, 2 groups were fed 1.5 times the NASEM requirements for beef cattle, 1 group was fed close to 75% of NASEM requirements for beef cattle (see Figure 3). Copper level in graze forage was low, zinc level was below requirement. Molybdenum levels were fairly high, which resulted in a risk of antagonism, particularly with copper.
Results, body weight and Body Condition Score
Body weight and body condition score of beef cattle included in the trial were similar between all 3 groups for the full 3-year study period, despite the fact that there was one year with extreme drought and another year with limited amounts of rainfall.
Results, trace mineral status and pregnancy rates
Trace mineral status of beef cattle at the beginning of the trial was good and was not different in year 1, but in years 2 and 3, there were highly significant differences for copper, zinc and manganese. Both Selko IntelliBond hydroxy trace mineral treatments were superior to the sulphate treatment (see figure 4, 5, 6).
In year 1 pregnancy rates to artificial insemination were not different, there was only a small numerical increase for the 1x hydroxy trace mineral group relative to sulphate group. In year 2 and 3, there were significant differences. Both Selko IntelliBond hydroxy trace mineral groups outperformed the sulphate group. As a result, more calves were born earlier in the calving season (see Figure 7).